<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking Primer &#8211; Social Bookmarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/03/28/social-networking-primer-social-bookmarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/03/28/social-networking-primer-social-bookmarking/</link>
	<description>Internet Geek, Blogger, Web Developer, Entrepreneur, Social Media and WordPress Enthusiast, Public Speaker, Husband and Dad. And Serious Caffeine Addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/03/28/social-networking-primer-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulholmes.ca/?p=269#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>I have used furl since July 2005. March 17 I discovered  that furl would be phased out by diigo. On March 29 diigo wrote me that transfer was completed: not all my 13449 furled bookmarks were there; I have to retrieve manually the hundred private to make them private again; stars, views are lost; dates,tags and keywords are mixed up, and it needs many clicks to set things right. In short, it is a huge mess and I ask: is it worth the trouble to classify again? Will diigo last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used furl since July 2005. March 17 I discovered  that furl would be phased out by diigo. On March 29 diigo wrote me that transfer was completed: not all my 13449 furled bookmarks were there; I have to retrieve manually the hundred private to make them private again; stars, views are lost; dates,tags and keywords are mixed up, and it needs many clicks to set things right. In short, it is a huge mess and I ask: is it worth the trouble to classify again? Will diigo last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hermann</title>
		<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/03/28/social-networking-primer-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-3055</link>
		<dc:creator>Hermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulholmes.ca/?p=269#comment-3055</guid>
		<description>I personally like http://xmarks.com - formerly called Foxmarks. 
It&#039;s a free service, and they have a great way to sync via plugins between all your computers and browsers... I use Firefox, Flock and sometimes even IE (for some stupid sites which don&#039;t work in a &quot;normal&quot; browser) - and xmarks keeps all my important bookmarks accessible everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like <a href="http://xmarks.com" rel="nofollow">http://xmarks.com</a> &#8211; formerly called Foxmarks.<br />
It&#8217;s a free service, and they have a great way to sync via plugins between all your computers and browsers&#8230; I use Firefox, Flock and sometimes even IE (for some stupid sites which don&#8217;t work in a &#8220;normal&#8221; browser) &#8211; and xmarks keeps all my important bookmarks accessible everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

