<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Names, Branding and BC Political Parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/05/06/domain-names-branding-and-bc-political-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/05/06/domain-names-branding-and-bc-political-parties/</link>
	<description>Internet Geek, Blogger, Web Developer, Entrepreneur, Social Media and WordPress Enthusiast, Public Speaker, Husband and Dad. And Serious Caffeine Addiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/05/06/domain-names-branding-and-bc-political-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-6383</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulholmes.ca/?p=338#comment-6383</guid>
		<description>First off, shorter is better.

But, more importantly, while the convention with provincial codes is a &quot;good idea&quot;, most &quot;normal&quot; people never really got it.

Think of &quot;toronto.on.ca&quot; vs. &quot;toronton.ca&quot; - the average Canadian consumer might not realize there&#039;s any difference.

In my business, I have seen more &quot;*bc.ca&quot; domains registered in the last year than *.bc.ca&quot;.  I would say both are bad, but it&#039;s all a matter of consumer understanding and usability.

All of this being said, I am still the proud owner of &quot;holmes.bc.ca&quot;, and will probably never own &quot;holmes.ca&quot; (the owner, who was kind enough to allow me to register holmes.bc.ca, just renewed it for 10 years recently), so I will hold on to holmes.bc.ca.  Of course, I use paulholmes.ca as my website (for all the reasons above).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, shorter is better.</p>
<p>But, more importantly, while the convention with provincial codes is a &#8220;good idea&#8221;, most &#8220;normal&#8221; people never really got it.</p>
<p>Think of &#8220;toronto.on.ca&#8221; vs. &#8220;toronton.ca&#8221; &#8211; the average Canadian consumer might not realize there&#8217;s any difference.</p>
<p>In my business, I have seen more &#8220;*bc.ca&#8221; domains registered in the last year than *.bc.ca&#8221;.  I would say both are bad, but it&#8217;s all a matter of consumer understanding and usability.</p>
<p>All of this being said, I am still the proud owner of &#8220;holmes.bc.ca&#8221;, and will probably never own &#8220;holmes.ca&#8221; (the owner, who was kind enough to allow me to register holmes.bc.ca, just renewed it for 10 years recently), so I will hold on to holmes.bc.ca.  Of course, I use paulholmes.ca as my website (for all the reasons above).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Jonkman</title>
		<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/05/06/domain-names-branding-and-bc-political-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-6369</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Jonkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulholmes.ca/?p=338#comment-6369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious, why do you think that the provincial subdomain is &quot;passé&quot;?

It&#039;s unfortunate that many municipalities have abandoned the convention of something like city.toronto.on.ca in favour of toronto.ca -- while it&#039;s easier to type, it makes for far more ambiguity.  Where&#039;s midland.ca for example?  http://maps.google.com/maps?q=midland%2C+canada

--Bob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious, why do you think that the provincial subdomain is &#8220;passé&#8221;?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate that many municipalities have abandoned the convention of something like city.toronto.on.ca in favour of toronto.ca &#8212; while it&#8217;s easier to type, it makes for far more ambiguity.  Where&#8217;s midland.ca for example?  <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=midland%2C+canada" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?q=midland%2C+canada</a></p>
<p>&#8211;Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/05/06/domain-names-branding-and-bc-political-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-4988</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulholmes.ca/?p=338#comment-4988</guid>
		<description>This would imply somebody has the job of doing this. As with most organizations of it&#039;s size, there is probably nobody responsible for this ... or coordinating social media efforts, marketing, branding, etc.  Oh heck, don&#039;t get me started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would imply somebody has the job of doing this. As with most organizations of it&#8217;s size, there is probably nobody responsible for this &#8230; or coordinating social media efforts, marketing, branding, etc.  Oh heck, don&#8217;t get me started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmicstraight</title>
		<link>http://www.paulholmes.ca/2009/05/06/domain-names-branding-and-bc-political-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-4985</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmicstraight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulholmes.ca/?p=338#comment-4985</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The BC Liberal Party - BCLIBERALS.COM - plural (wrong) and .COM (dead wrong).  Next election, they should change this.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

bcliberal.ca was registered to 0756822 B.C. LTD. It expired 2009/04/25, which is probably why its current status is SUSPD. 

The BC Liberals had better jump on this before someone else registers it. It would be a real shame if someone else scooped it up and used it to host a site critical of the party ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The BC Liberal Party &#8211; BCLIBERALS.COM &#8211; plural (wrong) and .COM (dead wrong).  Next election, they should change this.</p></blockquote>
<p>bcliberal.ca was registered to 0756822 B.C. LTD. It expired 2009/04/25, which is probably why its current status is SUSPD. </p>
<p>The BC Liberals had better jump on this before someone else registers it. It would be a real shame if someone else scooped it up and used it to host a site critical of the party <img src='http://www.paulholmes.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

